Earlier in the year the LAA conceded the central point in a Cost Appeal. (Have to keep the detail confidential).

It seemed a fairly obvious one to me coming as is did as a result of cost recoupment “makeitupaswegoalongery”. It never got as far as an ICA let alone an application for a Point of Principle – they just keeled over and agreed with us.

Now I sense that you can guess where this one is going.

“Do you remember our disagreement earlier in the year? Well I don’t, so can we go right back to the beginning?”

Brought these opening lines to mind:

“Like a circle in a spiral
Like a wheel within a wheel
Never ending or beginning
On an ever spinning reel”

We are in one of those phases where we are surrounded by files, with loads to do, and all against tight deadlines. Posting here is consequently likely to be sparse in the following days.

If you have a Mental Health or Community Care contract, or want one next time round, plans are now afoot for a retendering exercise,. Do have a look here.

*These are not a few of my favourite things

Tonight we get to see the wonderful I Am Kloot for the third time this year (hopefully for longer than their trunkated Festival No 6 slot). Tickets are still available.

You may take a different view, but I prefer this live, bare bones version to the full, Elbow produced album track with its star-studded video

We have just had the result of our only oral costs hearing since 2005. It is a thoroughly fair and very satisfying result.

At the heart of our case were a set of arguments we have rerun in a number of appeals. This is the first time we have had the opportunity to discuss them with a panel of 3 ICAs – and a proper discussion it was. I would go further, in the absence of a LAA Presenting Officer the panel tested our position more thoroughly than had they simply been adjudicating between two positions. There is no harm in that. Unanimously they agreed with our interpretation. The very same position has, on more than one occasion, been rejected by a single ICAs sitting alone, in camera.

At the weekend I spoke to a client who only achieved a similar degree of common sense by threatening JR.

One anticipates that there is no appetite to resolve this unhappy state of affairs.

Once again I am walled in by files including a Peer Review appeal and one of the weirdest set of instructions I’ve ever received – and about which I cannot elaborate.

Equally strangely last week involved more client questions about the former than I have received in a long time, though I think I am forming a view as to why that might be. I also made the point at the CLSA conference that this scheme is now long past its sell by date. A Peer Reviewer confirmed to me afterwards that there has been none of the essential “consistency training” in, at least, the last 3 years somewhat supporting my point. If Peer Review was ever the “Gold Standard” they thought it was it definitely isn’t now. Why in the present climate are they wasting about a Grand a time on the whim of a Contract Manager, or worse, at random?

That is not going to save me from this pile of files however – although it probably should.

I have only just bought the album of which this is the title track. It is one of those rare records which leaves you with goose pimples. I previously had only encountered Midlake as the musicians on John Grants first solo album this too is quite stunning

You might want to blog or tweet this for your own publicity.
7th worst last year for rejections
Now the best in the country

The background to this involved a very rare face-to-face discussion with a Contract Manager. Equally rarely I had little or nothing to say – the firm were bang to rights, the reasons for rejections were their fault, no excuses. The LAA HQ we leaning heavily on this local operative to sort it out, she was frustrated by the lack of progress.

The solution – we checked every civil bill for 6-months, liaised closely with a single member of the family team and hey presto. Last reported performance stats 0% rejects.

Worst 6 months of my life.

A Devolved Power/Delegated Function is properly to be exercised, by a category supervisor, in the light of his/her then knowledge and not by a non-legally trained, non-practicing assessor unavoidably applying hindsight some years later. This is the position CLA 56 attempts to summarise.

Discuss

I am putting the touches to my presentation for the CLSA Conference at the weekend. I have tried to do this well in advance and in a measured manner and am unhappy with the result. These things are always best done in a hurry, last minute, it seems. I am now wondering if it is better to rip it up and start again or to do an edit.

There are 2 days to go and still time to book.

Even a long weekend results in a post-holiday pile of urgent messages these days it seems. All of which has kept me from my planned main task of the day – Saturday’s LCSA presentation.

What an Icelandic tapas selection they prove to be – that seems to be their version of a smorgasbord.

The phone, apparently after a quiet day yesterday, is also ringing off the hook.

Better get on with the CLSA stuff don’t want to be adlibbing again this year.