I have spent all today looking at an Immigration CCA appeal based almost entirely proof of means issues. What an infuriating rule. No one involved in this business thinks these are ineligible clients. We must however engage in this shadow boxing regarding what is and isn’t acceptable proof of their lack of means. Neither has the LSC told this firm that retrospective evidence is acceptable on appeal so we now have very limited time to go out and find it.
Why can one public body, the LSC, contact another one, The Home Office, and confirm this in a matter of minutes? Why not simply give them access to the NASS data base? As Jim Royle would say “Joined up Government my arse”.
Share
