We reported here on, to our knowledge, the first major JR challenge to a Peer Review outcome.
Karen Todner, of major London firm Kaim Todner, has kindly sent us her thoughts on this experience which she concludes as follows:
“Until problems like this are resolved the LSC should look very carefully at that what they have actually got for their money from the IALS because in my view it’s not very much. And the profession should think very cautiously about co-operating with such a poorly thought out yet draconian scheme”.
The full article is too big to post in its entirety but is well worth reading and can be downloaded here.
Share
