We were informed of another Peer Review fail yesterday. Why are they continuing with this costly exercise especially in the light of the world economic situation? By now they know that “below competent” firms, as identified by PR, are statistically insignificant and other contractual options – a cost neutral SQM audit – are equally as likely, if not more so, to find them out.
Yes it was essentially a sole hand firm again. So by the time they have inevitably passed the follow up review, in 6-months time, that will have cost around £1,200.
Share
