We remain on tenterhooks over the dual contract JR. We are not idle however and are frankly glad to have had a little time to consider some rather alarming appeal matters.
In the meantime some of you continue to persevere with your Award Criteria answers – I persevere with trying to understand how one can reasonably apply the scoring grid on which any final decisions will be made. If, as I think likely, this will hinge upon marks between “very good” and “excellent”, it is hard to see how this can be done objectively and consistently. Here’s hoping we will not have to find out.
Others of you are rightly looking towards QA standards. Some are making brave decisions to have a late punt at Lexcel the remainder good ole SQM. Either way time is of the essence.