The LSC proposes a serious course of action against a firm, serious enough to jeopardise it’s ability to continue to deliver it’s contract. The firm, not surprisingly, objects. That objection is sustained by someone else at the commission. Leaving aside the time, expense and anxiety involved in all of this what about simple common sense. Couldn’t someone have asked “someone else”, a colleague in the same organisation, if this was a sensible course of action in the first place?
Meanwhile despite now knowing the views of “someone else” they intend to continue progressing the same course of action with another firm in a parallel situation.
Perhaps it me that’s mad!
Share
