Lets start the year on as positive a note as possible – every VHCC application we were involved with was successful congratulations to the firms involved! Furthermore we have only heard of one firm not making it, and that sounds like a mistake on the marking.
There were a couple of those applications which frankly we though did not have a hope and yet came up trumps. I have a strong suspicion that, in the final analysis, there was not the surfeit of applicants anticipated. Was this therefore a pointless and highly time consuming charade which did little more than allow firms who have previously done VHCCs to continue so to do?
Given that we are discussing scheme wide BVT some public evaluation of the experience would seem sensible.
Share